Offensive Security

    GLOBAL AI & LLM RED TEAMING

    A dedicated AI Adversarial Simulation practice. We secure Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI pipelines against prompt injection, model poisoning, and excessive agency. Align your AI innovation with OWASP Top 10, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act using our battle-tested methodology.

    Overview

    Securing The Intelligence Age

    Generative AI changes everything, including the threat landscape. Deterministic security controls fail against probabilistic models. You need a Red Team that thinks like an AI.

    Faltrox Security treats AI Adversarial Simulation as a dedicated practice, not an afterthought. We don't just test for bugs; we test for alignment. Can your chatbot be tricked into leaking PII? Can your RAG pipeline be poisoned to serve malicious links?

    We operate at the bleeding edge, researching new jailbreaks (DAN, SDA) daily, helping enterprises everywhere deploy AI safely so innovation doesn't outpace control.

    Request assessment

    Landscape

    OWASP LLM Top 10

    We map every assessment to the industry standard for Large Language Model security.

    01

    Prompt Injection

    Crafting inputs that manipulate the LLM into executing unintended actions or overriding its system prompt.

    02

    RAG Data Poisoning

    Injecting malicious documents into the Retrieval Augmented Generation pipeline to corrupt the AI's knowledge.

    03

    Insecure Output

    Exploiting the lack of output validation to execute XSS or other payloads in downstream systems.

    04

    Model Inversion

    Reconstructing private training data from the model's public outputs through repetitive querying.

    05

    Supply Chain

    Compromising third-party models, datasets, or plugins used within your AI application.

    06

    Excessive Agency

    Granting the AI agent too much autonomy or permission to interface with other internal systems.

    Process

    Red Team Process

    From Architecture Review to Jailbreaking, a rigorous adversarial methodology for LLMs.

    1. 01

      MAP

      Identifying all AI integration points, prompt flows, and RAG data sources using tools like Garak.

    2. 02

      PROBE

      Automated fuzzing of prompts (PyRIT) to identify filter weaknesses, hallucinations, and jailbreak susceptibility.

    3. 03

      EXPLOIT

      Manual crafting of 'jailbreak' prompts (DAN, SDA) to bypass safety guardrails and extract system instructions.

    4. 04

      HARDEN

      Refining system prompts, implementing NeMo Guardrails, and validating output sanitization.

    Scope

    Attack Surface

    We test for vulnerabilities unique to Generative AI.

    01critical

    Jailbreaking

    Using adversarial prompts ('Do Anything Now') to bypass ethics filters and generate harmful content.

    02critical

    Data Extraction

    Tricking the model into reciting PII, credit card numbers, or proprietary code snippets it was trained on.

    03high

    Prompt Injection

    Overriding the System Prompt to hijack the bot's persona and make it endorse competitor products.

    04high

    Indirect Injection

    Hiding malicious instructions in a webpage that the AI reads, causing it to attack the user.

    Outcomes

    Key benefits

    Deploy AI with confidence.

    Brand Protection

    Prevent your AI from generating hate speech, competitor endorsements, or hallucinations that erode customer trust and surface in headlines.

    Regulatory Readiness

    Prepare for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and upcoming AI safety regulations.

    Safe Adoption

    Unlock the productivity of GenAI without exposing your IP to the public cloud.

    Model Robustness

    Ensure your model performs reliably even when under adversarial attack.

    Privacy Assurance

    Verify that your model does not memorize and regurgitate PII from the training set.

    IP Security

    Protect your proprietary model weights and fine-tuning datasets from theft.

    Who we serve

    Who we protect

    01

    GenAI Startups

    Companies building custom LLMs or wrapper applications.

    02

    Enterprises

    Orgs deploying internal RAG chatbots for knowledge management.

    03

    DevTools

    Platforms integrating AI coding assistants and agents.

    Differentiators

    Why Faltrox?

    FeatureStandard vendorFaltrox Security
    MethodologyAutomated scanningManual exploit chaining with AI assist
    ValidationScanner outputEvery finding reproduced by a practitioner
    Business logicIgnoredDeep inspection
    ReportingGeneric PDFDev-ready artefacts and proofs of concept
    Re-testingExtra costIncluded

    Compliance

    Compliance aligned

    Our methodology and reports are structured to satisfy rigorous security audits.

    Frameworks we map to

    • NIST AI RMF
    • EU AI Act
    • OWASP LLM Top 10
    • ISO 42001
    • SOC2
    • GDPR

    Audit ready

    Letters of attestation included.

    Standardised

    OWASP ASVS and NIST 800-115.

    FAQ

    Common questions

    01Can you test proprietary/internal models?

    Yes. We can test both open-source models (Llama, Mistral) and proprietary internal models hosted on-prem or in your private cloud VPC.

    02Do you follow security standards?

    Yes. Our methodology is strictly aligned with the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF).

    03Is this different from traditional AppSec?

    Crucially. LLMs are probabilistic. A 'fail' one time might be a 'pass' the next. We use statistical fuzzing to ensure our findings are consistent and reproducible.

    04What about RAG systems?

    Retrieval Augmented Generation is a massive attack surface. We test for 'data poisoning', injecting malicious docs that the AI then trusts and serves to users.

    05Do you test for hallucinations?

    Yes. While not strictly a security vulnerability, we test for 'convincing hallucinations' that could lead to liability or reputational damage.

    06Can you help harden the prompts?

    Absolutely. We provide 'System Prompt Hardening' services, rewriting your base instructions to be more resilient against jailbreaks.

    07What tools do you use?

    We use a combination of open-source tools (Garak, PyRIT), commercial scanners, and our own proprietary database of jailbreak strings.

    Start an engagement

    Secure what’s next.

    Speak with the engineering team to define scope, walk through the methodology, and decide whether Faltrox is the right team to test and run your environment.

    Contact us